[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Yet this propaganda cannot conceal the truth.The fact that the theo-ry of evolution is the greatest deception in the history of science hasbeen expressed more and more in the scientific world over the last 20-30years.Research carried out after the 1980s in particular has revealed thatthe claims of Darwinism are totally unfounded, something that has beenstated by a large number of scientists.In the United States in particular,many scientists from such different fields as biology, biochemistry andpaleontology recognize the invalidity of Darwinism and employ the factof Creation to account for the origin of life.We have examined the collapse of the theory of evolution and theproofs of Creation in great scientific detail in many of our works, and arestill continuing to do so.Given the enormous importance of this subject,it will be of great benefit to summarize it here.The Scientific Collapse of DarwinismAs a pagan doctrine going back as far as ancient Greece, the theoryof evolution was advanced extensively in the nineteenth century.Themost important development that made it the top topic of the world ofscience was Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species, published in 1859.In195 GLOBAL FREEMASONRYthis book, he opposed, in his own eyes, the factthat Allah created different living species onEarth separately, for he erroneously claimedthat all living beings had a common ancestorand had diversified over time through smallchanges.Darwin's theory was not based on anyconcrete scientific finding; as he also accepted,it was just an "assumption." Moreover, as Dar-win confessed in the long chapter of his booktitled "Difficulties on Theory," the theoryfailed in the face of many critical questions.Charles DarwinDarwin invested all of his hopes in new scien-tific discoveries, which he expected to solve these difficulties.However,contrary to his expectations, scientific findings expanded the dimensionsof these difficulties.The defeat of Darwinism in the face of science can bereviewed under three basic topics:1) The theory cannot explain how life originated on Earth.2) No scientific finding shows that the "evolutionary mechanisms"proposed by the theory have any evolutionary power at all.3) The fossil record proves the exact opposite of what the theory sug-gests.In this section, we will examine these three basic points in generaloutlines:The First Insurmountable Step:The Origin of LifeThe theory of evolution posits that all living species evolved from asingle living cell that emerged on the primitive Earth 3.8 billion years ago.How a single cell could generate millions of complex living species and, ifsuch an evolution really occurred, why traces of it cannot be observed inthe fossil record are some of the questions that the theory cannot answer.However, first and foremost, we need to ask: How did this "first cell"originate?196 Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)Since the theory of evolution ignorantly denies Creation, it main-tains that the "first cell" originated as a product of blind coincidenceswithin the laws of nature, without any plan or arrangement.Accordingto the theory, inanimate matter must have produced a living cell as a resultof coincidences.Such a claim, however, is inconsistent with the most unas-sailable rules of biology."Life Comes From Life"In his book, Darwin never referred to the origin of life.The primitiveunderstanding of science in his time rested on the assumption that livingbeings had a very simple structure.Since medieval times, spontaneousgeneration, which asserts that non-living materials came together to formliving organisms, had been widely accepted.It was commonly believedthat insects came into being from food leftovers, and mice from wheat.Interesting experiments were conducted to prove this theory.Some wheatwas placed on a dirty piece of cloth, and it was believed that mice wouldoriginate from it after a while.Similarly, maggotsdeveloping in rottingmeat was assumed to beevidence of spontaneousgeneration.However, itwas later understoodthat worms did notThrough his experiments,Louis Pasteur invalidated theidea that life can emerge frominanimate matter, on whichthe theory of evolution isbased.197 GLOBAL FREEMASONRYappear on meat spontaneously, but were carried there by flies in the formof larvae, invisible to the naked eye.Even when Darwin wrote The Origin of Species, the belief that bacteriacould come into existence from non-living matter was widely accepted inthe world of science.However, five years after the publication of Darwin's book, LouisPasteur announced his results after long studies and experiments, that dis-proved spontaneous generation, a cornerstone of Darwin's theory.In histriumphal lecture at the Sorbonne in 1864, Pasteur said: "Never will the doc-trine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck bythis simple experiment."142For a long time, advocates of the theory of evolution resisted these find-ings.However, as the development of science unraveled the complex struc-ture of the cell of a living being, the idea that life could come into being coin-cidentally faced an even greater impasse.Inconclusive Efforts of the Twentieth CenturyThe first evolutionist who took up the subject of the origin of life in thetwentieth century was the renowned Russian biologist Alexander Oparin.With various theses he advanced in the 1930s, he tried to prove that a livingcell could originate by coincidence.These studies, however, were doomed tofailure, and Oparin had to make the following confes-sion:Unfortunately, however, the problem of the originof the cell is perhaps the most obscure point in thewhole study of the evolution of organisms.143Evolutionist followers of Oparin tried to carry outexperiments to solve this problem.The best knownexperiment was carried out by the American chemistStanley Miller in 1953.Combining the gases he allegedto have existed in the primordial Earth's atmosphere inan experiment set-up, and adding energy to the mix-Russian biologistAlexander Oparin198 Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)ture, Miller synthesized several organic molecules (amino acids) present inthe structure of proteins.Barely a few years had passed before it was revealed that this experi-ment, which was then presented as an important step in the name ofevolution, was invalid, for the atmosphere used in the experiment wasvery different from the real Earth conditions.144After a long silence, Miller confessed that the atmosphere mediumhe used was unrealistic.145All the evolutionists' efforts throughout the twentieth century toexplain the origin of life ended in failure.The geochemist Jeffrey Bada,from the San Diego Scripps Institute accepts this fact in an article publishedin Earth magazine in 1998:Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest unsolvedproblem that we had when we entered the twentieth century: How did lifeoriginate on Earth?146The Complex Structure of LifeThe primary reason why the theory of evolution ended up in such agreat impasse regarding the origin of life is that even those living organ-isms deemed to be the simplest have outstandingly complex structures.The cell of a living thing is more complex than all of our man-made tech-nological products
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]